📢 Exclusive on Gate Square — #PROVE Creative Contest# is Now Live!
CandyDrop × Succinct (PROVE) — Trade to share 200,000 PROVE 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46469
Futures Lucky Draw Challenge: Guaranteed 1 PROVE Airdrop per User 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46491
🎁 Endless creativity · Rewards keep coming — Post to share 300 PROVE!
📅 Event PeriodAugust 12, 2025, 04:00 – August 17, 2025, 16:00 UTC
📌 How to Participate
1.Publish original content on Gate Square related to PROVE or the above activities (minimum 100 words; any format: analysis, tutorial, creativ
DeFi Security Offense and Defense: In-depth Analysis of Common Vulnerabilities and Protection Strategies
Common Security Vulnerabilities in DeFi and Preventive Measures
Recently, a security expert shared a lesson on DeFi security for community members. The expert reviewed the major security incidents that the Web3 industry has encountered over the past year, discussed the reasons behind these events and how to avoid them, summarized common security vulnerabilities of smart contracts and preventive measures, and provided some security advice for project parties and ordinary users.
Common types of DeFi vulnerabilities mainly include flash loans, price manipulation, function permission issues, arbitrary external calls, fallback function problems, business logic vulnerabilities, private key leakage, and reentrancy, among others. This article will focus on flash loans, price manipulation, and reentrancy attacks.
Flash Loan
Flash loans are an innovation of Decentralized Finance, but they are often exploited by hackers for attacks. Attackers borrow large amounts of funds through flash loans to manipulate prices or attack business logic. Developers need to consider whether contract functions may become abnormal due to large amounts of funds, or whether it is possible to interact with multiple functions in a single transaction to obtain improper rewards through large amounts of funds.
Many DeFi projects appear to offer high returns, but in reality, the level of the project teams varies widely. Some projects may have their code purchased, and even if the code itself has no vulnerabilities, there may still be logical issues. For example, some projects distribute rewards at fixed times based on the number of tokens held by holders, but attackers can exploit flash loans to purchase a large number of tokens and obtain most of the rewards when the distribution occurs.
Price Manipulation
Price manipulation issues are closely related to flash loans, mainly because certain parameters in price calculation can be controlled by users. There are two common types of issues:
Reentrancy Attack
Reentrancy attacks are one of the main dangers that can be faced when calling external contracts. An attacker may take control of the control flow and make unexpected changes to the data.
There are many ways that reentrancy can occur with different contracts, potentially involving different functions of the contract or functions of multiple different contracts. When addressing the issue of reentrancy, the following points should be noted:
In the Web3 space, using mature security practices is wiser than reinventing the wheel. Utilizing well-validated solutions can significantly reduce the likelihood of issues arising.
Project Party Security Recommendations
How Users Can Determine if a Smart Contract is Safe
By paying attention to these points, users can better assess the security of smart contracts and reduce the risks associated with participating in Decentralized Finance projects.