AI and Crypto Assets: The Choices of Eastern and Western Philosophers

Artificial intelligence and Crypto Assets, as two disruptive technologies, not only drive technological innovation but also provoke profound philosophical reflection. From Western rationalism to Eastern intuition and the concept of freedom, different philosophical schools offer us diverse perspectives to examine these two technologies. Let's explore the views that several Western and Eastern philosophers might have on AI and Crypto Assets.

Views of Western Philosophers

Socrates: Favoring AI, but wary of its misuse

Socrates might appreciate the potential of AI, but he would also be concerned that it could be misused as a tool for sophistication. He might hope that AI can inspire deep thinking on moral and philosophical levels, rather than becoming a mere tool.

Aristotle: Supports Crypto Assets, Opposes AI's RLHF

Aristotle might oppose AI trained through human feedback reinforcement learning ( RLHF ), believing it deviates from natural balance and wisdom. In contrast, the decentralized nature of Crypto Assets aligns more with the "natural law" he advocates.

Descartes: Supports AI, especially RLHF training

Descartes might support AI, especially AI that simulates human thinking through RLHF training. He might consider this AI as an extension of human reason and cognitive ability, worthy of pursuit.

Voltaire: Tendency towards Crypto Assets

Voltaire may be attracted to the decentralization and anti-establishment characteristics of Crypto Assets. As a challenge to traditional financial and political systems, Crypto Assets align with his advocacy for personal freedom and anti-authoritarian spirit.

Leibniz: Support for AI

Leibniz might be very interested in AI, especially in how AI handles complex problems through efficient logic and algorithms. He might view AI as an extension of human intelligence, helping to create a more orderly world.

Kant: Tendency towards Crypto Assets

Kant might have a cautious attitude towards AI, especially when AI ignores universal and lofty moral demands. In contrast, he might be more supportive of the decentralized nature of Crypto Assets, believing that it better upholds moral principles and human freedom.

Nietzsche: Support Crypto Assets

Nietzsche might be attracted to the decentralized characteristics of Crypto Assets, seeing it as a subversion and reshaping of traditional values, in line with his philosophy of "eternal recurrence."

Wittgenstein: Support for AI

Wittgenstein might be interested in the advancements of AI in semantic understanding and language processing. He might believe that AI can change the way the world expresses itself through automated language generation, promoting human thought and linguistic innovation.

The Perspective of Eastern Philosophers

Laozi: Support Crypto Assets

Laozi might think that the decentralized nature of Crypto Assets aligns better with the concept of "wu wei" (non-action), while being cautious about the centralization and excessive intervention of AI.

Zhuangzi: Tendency towards Crypto Assets

Zhuangzi might consider that the decentralization and anti-traditional nature of Crypto Assets aligns more with his pursuit of freedom, while the rule-based nature of AI may be seen as a limitation on human freedom.

Confucius: Support AI

Confucius might support AI, provided that it can promote social harmony, enhance individual moral cultivation, and strengthen social responsibility. He might focus on the application of AI in education and moral development.

Zen (Huineng): Tend toward Crypto Assets

Zen Buddhism may be more supportive of Crypto Assets, believing that it allows people to break free from the constraints of traditional power structures, aligning with Zen's pursuit of freedom and liberation.

Buddhism (Nagarjuna Bodhisattva): supports Crypto Assets

Buddhism may consider the decentralized mechanism of Crypto Assets to align with the concept of "emptiness," while the centralized characteristics of AI may conflict with the core tenets of Buddhism.

Indian Philosophy: Supporting AI

Indian philosophy may consider that AI has the potential to accelerate human self-awareness and the exploration of inner wisdom, especially in the fields of psychology, meditation, and spiritual development.

Wang Yangming: Support AI

Wang Yangming might believe that AI can help achieve "unity of knowledge and action" by enabling individuals to gain wisdom through deep learning and feedback mechanisms in practice, thus promoting moral cultivation.

Conclusion

AI and Crypto Assets, as representatives of modern technology, have profound connections with traditional philosophical thought. Different cultural backgrounds and philosophical schools have varying attitudes towards these two technologies, reflecting their importance in driving social change and provoking ethical considerations. Whether it is Western rational thinking or Eastern natural philosophy, both provide us with valuable perspectives for understanding and responding to these emerging technologies.